NeuroEdit
  • Services
    • Editing & proofreading
    • Translation
    • Figure preparation
    • Publication support
  • About
  • Fees
  • Policies
    • Terms & conditions
    • Privacy
    • Cookies
    • Guarantee
  • Learn
    • NeuroEdit blog
    • Journal guidelines
    • Frequently asked questions
  • Contact

Write well to... reduce research waste

20/11/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Post by Julia Slone-Murphy | Photo by Gary Chan on Unsplash
A shocking amount of health research is thrown away. Are you sitting down?
It’s estimated that 85% of all health research is avoidably wasted. This happens because:
  • completed research isn't always published
  • published reports are often not clear, complete, or accurate enough for others to understand and replicate the data
  • studies are not set in the context of a thorough literature review, and so they don't build upon previous lessons learned.
All these issues can be rectified by careful, accurate and complete reporting.

But how do you know what to report? Thankfully, there is plenty of help out there. Guidelines have been developed and published specifically to help authors remember all the essential points that should be included when writing about a study. There are more than 400 of them (all named with catchy acronyms) covering every kind of study. Major ones include CONSORT for randomised clinical trials, STROBE for observational studies, PRISMA for systematic reviews, and ARRIVE for animal studies. 

For example, if you're reporting on a clinical trial, the CONSORT guidelines will help ensure you include the following in your report (among many other points):
  • In the title: the words “randomised trial”, so that the report can be indexed correctly.
  • In the introduction: reference to a systematic review of the subject area - or a note that there isn't one - to show that your participants were not unnecessarily exposed to the risks of research. 
  • In the methods: a full description of the trial design, including whether it was parallel, crossover, factorial, etc.; how the participants were randomised; and what the inclusion and exclusion criteria were (and if there were any changes to them once the study had commenced). 
  • In the results: a flow chart of the participants to show enrolment, randomisation, treatment allocation, dropouts or losses to follow-up, and analysis; baseline data; primary and other outcomes; and any reports of harms or unintended effects.
  • In the discussion: an acknowledgement of the study's limitations, and a balanced interpretation of the results.​
Is it compulsory to follow these guidelines?
Some journals do require submitted manuscripts to follow reporting guidelines, but many more just recommend doing so. So for most journals, no, following these guidelines is not compulsory. However, in my strong opinion, it seems senseless to ignore them, especially given the shocking statistic on waste, which is largely a result of authors not following such guidelines. Reporting your study completely - by following the appropriate guideline and including all the information listed in the checklist for that guideline - will benefit you, your colleagues, and the field as a whole. In addition, it will avoid wasting the valuable resources used in your study - whether this means the money you spent on reagents and equipment, animals that were sacrificed in the pursuit of scientific advancement, or human volunteers who gave their time and exposed themselves to the risks of research.

All the guidelines named above - and hundreds more - are listed in a searchable database from the Equator Network, which also has a flow chart and tools to help you choose the most appropriate guideline for your study.

Next, find out how you can write in a way that helps boost citations once you've published! And if you missed it, catch up on the previous post in this series, where I explain how writing well can help you improve the peer review process.

    Enjoyed this post? Subscribe for more!

    We promise not to bombard you - we'll usually send no more than one email a month - and you can unsubscribe at any time. For more information, please see our privacy policy.
Subscribe to Newsletter
At NeuroEdit, we help researchers publish faster and more effectively. We work with native and non-native English speakers at all stages of their career. If you're writing a paper and all the information we've listed above sounds too time-consuming or too difficult to implement, we can help. Not only can we ensure your manuscript follows the right guideline for your study, but we will also eliminate linguistic errors, make your writing engaging, showcase your figures professionally (including CONSORT flowcharts), and more - usually within a week, and often for around the price of an antibody!  Contact us to see how we can help you improve your manuscript.

Previous post: Write well to improve peer review

Next post: Write well to publish effectively
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

      Keep updated!

      Sign up to our newsletter to receive updates about new blog posts, and occasional promotions and discounts. 

      We promise not to bombard you - we'll usually send no more than one email a month - and you can unsubscribe at any time. For more information, please see our privacy policy.
    Subscribe to Newsletter

    Archives

    December 2018
    November 2018

    Categories

    All
    Author Instructions
    Citations
    Improve Your Writing
    Keywords
    Peer Review
    Plain Language
    Public Engagement
    Publish Fast
    Readership
    Reporting Guidelines
    Research Waste
    Science Communication
    Why Edit Your Work?

    RSS Feed

We've helped researchers publish in:

/

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PNAS, NeuroImage, Journal of Neuroscience, Scientific Reports, Neurobiology of Aging, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Journal of Physiology, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, Journal of Neurochemistry, American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, Behavioural Brain Research, Frontiers in Neurology, and more...

/

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

/

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PLoS One, Brain Research, Psychiatry Research, Brain Research Bulletin, European Journal of Pharmacology, Psychological Research, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, Metabolic Brain Disease, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, Cell and Molecular Neurobiology, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, Neuroscience Letters, and more...

/

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 0
  • 1

Leave the manuscript with us. Your research needs you.

OK. Help me publish
© 2011–2019 NeuroEdit Ltd. 
NeuroEdit Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number 10232582. Registered office: 15 Queen Square, Leeds, LS2 8AJ, UK.
​Privacy policy
  • Services
    • Editing & proofreading
    • Translation
    • Figure preparation
    • Publication support
  • About
  • Fees
  • Policies
    • Terms & conditions
    • Privacy
    • Cookies
    • Guarantee
  • Learn
    • NeuroEdit blog
    • Journal guidelines
    • Frequently asked questions
  • Contact